#Run in macspice simulator
#Run in macspice mac

Use rawfile as the default file into which the results of the simulation are saved. Command completion is not available unless the standard input is a terminal, however. This is useful if the standard input is not a terminal but interactive mode is desired. This is like batch mode, except that a temporary rawfile is used and then written to the standard output, preceded by a line with a single after the simulation is done. using the IO redirection notation of '<') SpiceВ 3 defaults to batch mode (-i overrides). Note that if the input source is not a terminal ( e.g. keyboard) or reads the given input file and performs the analyses specified output is either Spice2-like line-printer plots ('ascii plots') or a Spice rawfile. SpiceВ 3 reads the default input source ( e.g. The program is being run on a terminal with mfb name term. It is not found then in the user's home directory.

Spice and Nutmeg try to find the file in the current directory, and if Nutmeg only.Дon't try to source the file '.spiceinit' upon startup. Nutmeg Дon't try to load the default data file ('rawspice.raw') if no other files are given. See the appropriate documentation onД¬ommand Synopsis Spice Using X on a workstation, the DISPLAY variable should already be set if you want toДisplay graphics on a system different from the one you are running SpiceВ 3 or Nutmeg on,ДISPLAY should be of the form ' machine:0.0'. Otherwise, a graphics-terminal independent interface (MFB) is used. Spice and Nutmeg use the X Window System for plotting if they find the environment variableДISPLAY. Standard output, which may also be produced by SpiceВ 3 with the '-b' command line option. Note that the raw output file is different from the data that Spice2 writes to the In nutmeg where this is not the case, Spice-only commands have been marked with an asterisk Most of the commands available in the interactive SpiceВ 3 front end are available Interactive SpiceВ 3 can plot data from a simulation on a graphics terminal or a workstationДisplay. Write command in an interactive SpiceВ 3 session. Nutmeg will read in the 'raw' data output file created by SpiceВ -r or with the TheДЇront-end may be run as a separate 'stand-alone' program under the name Nutmeg.

#Run in macspice simulator

Now, thanks to muffs DIY forum, I have so many pcbs I don't need to make my own any more.SpiceВ 3 consists of a simulator and a front-end for data analysis and plotting.

#Run in macspice mac

I did not shell out for a Mac because I enjoy that crap.

Over the years I've wasted countless hours installing huge dependency trees, dicking with build scripts and package managers, and struggling to learn archaic interfaces and obfuscationally documented tools which don't stack up to ORCAD from the late 80s. Personally, I'm past the point where I've cut my losses on open source EDA tools on OSX. Then users report OSX specific interface bugs which are never fixed by the dev team because they don't have Macs. While they pay lip service to the (potentially) cross-platform nature of their projects, nobody has a Mac and it's up to someone outside the project to bandage a package together and figure out what kind of hacks you need to do to get a build going.

The truth is these open source devs use Linux on the desktop as a religion. The experience with Kicad on OSX is similar. I can limp through getting a library and schematic together in gschem, but every time I've used pcb on OSX there were some game-ending bugs. I've tried to use gEDA on and off for years first on Linux and then on OSX. but i would be interested in what others thought. I know one of the guys that help develop it.